Aleksander Peczenik – – Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 () details Aleksander Peczenik – – Law and Philosophy 4 (2) – details. List of computer science publications by Aleksander Peczenik. Aleksander Peczenik: Jumps and Logic in the Law|What Can One Expect from. The basis of legal justification [Aleksander Peczenik] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
|Published (Last):||25 February 2006|
|PDF File Size:||10.39 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.73 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Nonmonotonic Logic in Logic and Philosophy of Logic. Direct download 2 more. Science Logic and Mathematics. The Autonomy of Law: This entry has no external links.
Giovanni Sartor – – Ratio Juris 7 2: It seems impossible to make logical reconstruction of the totality of legal argumentation. Options 1 filter applied. Yet, all kinds of legal argumentation must use weighing and balancing in order to make the law coherent and morally acceptable. Among general theories of legal dogmatics, one may mention the theories of negligence, intent, adequate causation and ownership.
Legal doctrine in Continental European law consists of professional legal writings, e. The argumentation used to achieve coherence involves not only description and logic but also evaluative steps.
dblp: Aleksander Peczenik
However, sceptics criticise juristic doctrine for its normative character, ontological obscurity, vagueness, fragmentation, and locality. Moral Justification in Meta-Ethics. Ritchie – – Carolina Academic Press.
Restrictions pro authors only online only open access only published pecznik filter by language Configure languages here.
The author answers this criticism pointing out the following. From the Publisher via CrossRef no proxy doi. Peczennik Law in Philosophy of Law. The inference is not conclusive. Weighing of principles plays a great role in legal argumentation, inter alia in statutory interpretation.
Aleksander Peczenik – – Dbk.
The argumentation used to achieve coherence involves not only description and logic but also evaluative steps. Formalism about Legal Reasoning in Philosophy of Law. Atria – peczrnik Law and Philosophy 18 5: Legal Reasoning and Adjudication in Philosophy of Law.
A Defence of the Original View. Aleksander Peczenik – – Argumentation 9 5: The author adopts a coherentist approach to legal argumentation.
Aleksander Peczenik, The Basis of Legal Justification – PhilPapers
Sign in to use this feature. However, sceptics criticise juristic doctrine for its normative This article has no associated abstract. The Three Faces of Defeasibility in the Law. Maimonides, Nature and Natural Law.
The Basis of Legal Justification
Choose how you want to monitor it: The Role of Coherence in Legal Reasoning. The theories produce principles and they also produce defeasible rules.
The vagueness of legal doctrine can be construed as defeasibility. Legal Positivism in Philosophy of Law. Both contain moral substantive reasons and legal authority reasons. Joseph David – unknown. Direct download 3 more. Can Philosophy Help Legal Doctrine?
Find it on Scholar.
No keywords specified fix it. Joseph Raz – – Oxford University Press. Essays on Legal Positivism. Nonmonotonic logic is an example of an extension of the domain of logic. Feminism, Law, and Bioethics.