Das postmoderne Wissen by Jean-Francois Lyotard, , available at Book Depository with free delivery worldwide. Das postmoderne Wissen. Ein Bericht. Jean-François Lyotard. Table of Contents. Is this table of contents incomplete? Click here to add the missing references. Das postmoderne Wissen by Jean-François Lyotard at – ISBN 10 : – ISBN – Passagen Verlag Ges.
|Published (Last):||4 December 2005|
|PDF File Size:||12.7 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||6.61 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
InLyotard earned a State doctorate with his dissertation Discours, figure under Mikel Dufrenne —the work was published the same year.
For example, for any new social, political or scientific revolution we could ask the question, “Is this revolution a step towards the greater well-being of the mass of human beings? Lyotard’s work continues to be important in politicsphilosophysociologyliteratureartand cultural studies.
Each coincides with a school of thought. Adorno ‘s negative dialectics because he viewed them as seeking a “therapeutic resolution in the framework of a religion, here the religion of history.
Wikiquote has quotations related to: Lyotard’s work is characterised by a persistent opposition to universalsmeta-narrativesand generality. SchriftTwentieth-Century French Philosophy: He studied philosophy at the Sorbonne in the late s. That is, the story of how the human race has postmoedrne itself free that brings together the language game of science, the language game wissenn human historical conflicts and the language game of human qualities into the overall justification of the steady development of the human race in terms of wealth and moral well-being.
Das postmoderne Wissen
Rapport sur le savoir The Postmodern Condition: Whenever we try to understand or even memorize: The language game of human passions, qualities and faults c. Lyotard saw postmodernism as a latent tendency within thought throughout time and not a narrowly limited historical period.
According to his La Condition postmoderne: In concentrating on specific differences, Lyotard’s thought becomes overly dependent on differences; between categories that are given as fixed and well defined. Why should these differences lyotar privileged over an endless division and reconstruction of groups? Either there were no gas chambers, in which case there would be no eyewitnesses to produce evidence, or there were gas chambers, in which case there would still be no eyewitnesses to produce evidence, because they would be dead.
Das postmoderne Wissen | Lyotard Jean-François
For Lyotard, in Lessons on the Analytic of the Sublimebut drawing on his argument in The Differendthis is a good thing. Inwhile preparing for a conference on postmodernism and media theoryhe died unexpectedly from a case of leukemia that had advanced rapidly. In the ‘mathematically’ sublime, an object strikes the mind in such a way that we find ourselves postmderne to take it in as a whole. A Report on Knowledgethe impact of the postmodern condition was to provoke skepticism about universalizing theories.
The Challenge of the Postmodern Age p. According to this metanarrative, the justification of science is related to wealth and education. His writings in this period mostly concern with ultra-left politicswith a focus on the Algerian situation—which he witnessed first-hand while teaching philosophy in Constantine.
However, the act of being able to bridge the two and understand the claims of both parties, is the first step towards finding a wiissen. Toward a Postmodern Philosophy.
So, in putting forward a false argument against a rational consensus, Lyotard plays into the hands of the irrational forces that often give rise to injustice and differ ends. As a child, Lyotard had many aspirations: Lyotard argues that one day, in order for knowledge to be considered useful, it will have to be converted into computerized data.
Les Editions de Minuit. Faurisson will only accept proof of the existence of gas chambers from eyewitnesses who were themselves victims of the gas chambers.
University of Minnesota Press. It attacks Lyotard’s search for division over consensus on the grounds that it involves a philosophical mistake with serious political and social repercussions.
If the addressor, the addressee, and the sense of the testimony are neutralized, everything takes place as if there were no damages.